Some people believe governments should spend money in saving languages of few speakers from dying out completely. Others think this is a waste of financial resources. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is a hotly debate on whether governments should using financial resources to prevent some languages from dying out, some people hold the opinion that every language is vital so government should protect it while others think that is just a waste of money. In my point of view, I think it is neccserary for government to use financial power to help those languages, but I also think those money might have better way to use.
As we all know, language is the window of culture and its own history, if a language disappear, it means a culture disappear. For example, there are some unique languages in the rural area in China, some villages have their own culture which using language as a plarform. This unique culture shows an important role in the whole Chinese history and it is useful for historians to explore more in history development.
But if one language is going to die out, it means there are such a small group of people still using it and it is not as an effective way of communication as common languages like English , at the meantime, protecting a dying-out needs not only a great amount of money but also hard work, so it need to consider that whether it is worth to spend so much in this case.
And I think there is still a lack of common languages education, so it is a more useful and meaningful way of government to spend money on. For example, English is the most common languages in the world, so in this global era it is important for everyone to learn English, but there are still a lot of people can’t speak English in China, so I think the government should spend more financial resources on encourage more people to learn English.
It is no doubt that government need to save languages from dying out and I don’t think that is a waste of money since such important roles every languages are, I do think there are some other way to spend money on languages. But it doesen’t means the government should only choose one to do, so why not do both?
- some people think that in this modern world people are getting dependent on each other while others think the modern world makes people more independent of each other discuss both views and give your own opinion 74
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some businesses find that when new employees join them after finishing their education they lack basic interpersonal skills such as the ability to work with their colleagues as part of team What do you think are the causes of this problem and offer some p 36
- Some people believe governments should spend money in saving languages of few speakers from dying out completely. Others think this is a waste of financial resources. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Nowadays people show more anti social behavior and lack of respect to others What are the causes How could we improve the situation 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('hotly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('debate') instead of another adjective.
There is a hotly debate on whether governments should using fin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 389, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'those moneys', 'those monies'?
Suggestion: this money; those moneys; those monies
... help those languages, but I also think those money might have better way to use. As w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 74, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'groups'?
Suggestion: groups
...ie out, it means there are such a small group of people still using it and it is not ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 188, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ication as common languages like English , at the meantime, protecting a dying-out...
^^
Line 13, column 45, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'languages'' or 'language's'?
Suggestion: languages'; language's
...I think there is still a lack of common languages education, so it is a more useful and m...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, while, for example, i think, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57894736842 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56650499617 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434903047091 0.561755894193 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 20.2975951904 177% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.428098422 49.4020404114 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.3 106.682146367 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.1 20.7667163134 174% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35384647753 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152962921115 0.084324248473 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114291997022 0.0667982634062 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211237768313 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101052673543 0.056905535591 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.4 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.88 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.1190380762 162% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.