Hosting important sports events has been a matter of contention. There appeared endless conflicting attitudes toward this: Some people hold firm to the belief that it would benefit the nation, whereas the rest are of the opposite opinion. Such notions are critically deliberated in this essay.
On the one hand, enhancing the community's image and economic growth are worth contemplating. It is widely acknowledged that global sports coverage by the media is an effective way to promote the reputation of the country on foreign TV channels and manifold platforms. For instance, the participant of U23 Vietnam in the final of 2018 Championship engaged a great deal of people over the world by their fair play, and this also made a beautiful impression on Vietnamese. More notably, large amounts of financial profit are gained during the time hosting a global sports event. As a case in point, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil was much better after hosting the 2016 Olympics with enough benefits for the construction of four new schools with modern equipment, an important network of transport with the revival of a historic area Porto Maravilha and tourism industry.
On the other hand, the overloaded population and outrageous expenditures are of paramount importance. It cannot be denied that although hosting sport events has some benefit for the tourism industry, densely populated is a serious situation that cannot be completely solved. To illustrate, hotels' rooms or homestays may not totally serve the tourists and visitors, affecting the local’s living standard through the sports season. More remarkably, organizing international events requires a gigantic investment to construct stadiums, sport facilities, and hiring workers to reach the criteria. As a result, the government may struggle with the deficit of public finance funds and maybe a huge debt also needs to be paid; and this is especially harsh with small and developing countries.
All in all, while I accept that organizing mega sport events has few benefits, I favour the fact that it is sometimes disadvantageous to the nation, especially in some developing countries. Government ought to thoroughly consider the aforementioned points to make the right decision: whether they should host the events or not.
- Surveys show that people are living longer in many countries But increased life expectancy has many implications for aging individuals and for society as a whole What are the possible effects of longer living for individuals and society 92
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999 89
- Some people believe that hosting international sports events is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both these views and state your opinion 89
- Some people say that products should be designed to last as long as possible Others say that it is more important for to be as cheap as possible 89
- Although many people value their public parks this space could be better used for other purposes such as residential areas for the ever growing population or to develop business and boost economies To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 131, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
.... It is widely acknowledged that global sports coverage by the media is an effective w...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 562, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...gained during the time hosting a global sports event. As a case in point, Rio de Janei...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, whereas, while, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34540389972 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91691737629 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621169916435 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6849681941 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.933333333 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21685296601 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061710999085 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506745364007 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12770056073 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023224254581 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.