An often debatable topic is whether individuals or the government should play a role in saving the evironment. Some people believe it is the duty of the government whereas others think individuals should be responsible for it. However, i believe that both should strive to take care of the environment as the government has more budget and the attitiude of people towards anything can make a big difference.
To begin with, people pay taxes to the government so that it can work on a large scale to prevent their environment from harm. When paying a considerable amount each month, it is the duty of those in power to take measures to protect the environment. Moreover, the orders decreed by those in powers are followed promptly. For instance, the government can prohibit the making of air conditioners or cars which emit excessive and harmful smoke which is the leading cause of air pollution. Hence, cleansing the air from dangerous chemicals which can cause breathing problems.
On the other hand, the change of behaviour of individuals can markedly improve the environment of a place because these are people who make a community. Moreover, the steps taken by inhabitants leave great impression on the minds of their fellows. For example, if more and more people would plant trees, excessive carbon dioxide and other chemicals would be absorbed by them and in return they will add Oxygen in the air which is absolutely necessary for the survival. Therefore, the role of people can never be taken forgranted.
To conclude, although the government is being paid to make the environment safe, people themselves can make a great difference by initiating small acts of improvement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... should be responsible for it. However, i believe that both should strive to take...
^
Line 5, column 431, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessary'.
Suggestion: necessary
...hey will add Oxygen in the air which is absolutely necessary for the survival. Therefore, the role o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06093189964 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84290627853 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7864096039 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.615384615 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278978808796 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100813457826 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123630860546 0.0667982634062 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176813823149 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148102661439 0.056905535591 260% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.