Presently, women are seen working equally with men. There are people who believe that the duties and contributions of ladies in professions like army and police should match with that of men because the females are equally strong. However, others believe that women are fragile and not tough to be successful in these fields. I believe that women of this age are stronger than before and they can work effectively with men in police and military.
To begin with, there is no single aspect of work seen where ladies are not contributing their services. Women of contemporary era are empowered and powerful enough to choose any career. In myriads countries, lady army officers and policewomen are working who are not only seen with respect, but are a motivation for others too. They work in same harsh environment, and have same duty hours. An article was published in Dawn newspaper which read the role of women in military. Earlier there was not any concept of seeing females in military. Nevertheless, women have set a new trend now because they are as strong as men.
On the other hand, there are some people who still think these professions do not suit females owing to their fragile and weak nature. They believe females are not mentally and physically strong to take bold decisions and face the consequences. Therefore, they should not waste their time in trying to be part of these noble occupations. A survey of Lahore showed that more than 70% of people do not support the idea of women working in army because they are naturally not made for such tasks.
To conclude, although females are naturally less strong than men, they can work equally and with more responsibility in delicate areas like military.
I also favour the notion of women empowerment and acknowledge the fact that they can be very useful employees in army and poloce.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87341772152 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54626317903 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503164556962 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.195155376 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5882352941 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5882352941 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17647058824 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246056321355 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853773327133 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560120246048 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134306722257 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789624541244 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.