Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Many researchers say that people’s brain immediately hold bad situations. Also, majority of people think more bad events and, however, some try to escape thinking badness. These views have influenced hard people. So, I will debate these opinions and give my view in these paragraphs.
Most of people believe and get bad sights and situations, once. If one says negative view about other person, others agree his/her sights. We know that everybody has good and bad behavior or every situation have two impacts for all. For this reason, people say that once bitten twice shy, such as, they frustrate to do some work or hesitate to be good some event. Because, they are had an influenced last events or practices. For instance, my classmate always considers that majority people might be bad and every event or process can impact badly for her.
On the other hand, some claim that every situation may be for goodness. Behind this event, people will learn another skill. So, they try to do better now rather than past. And then they suggest if people think about goodness, their life and work may improve and be good. For example, my neighbor always considers that every person should do good work and look at “the world” with the best ideas and “eyes”. As a result, they can get improved and reside peace- say he.
If I say my point view, people should do think about the best situation and agree them. At that time, they can be good at some work or improve.
To conclude, many people, immediately, receive bad situations. Other people try to escape thinking bad process. I, personally, believe that people do not consider about them and agree them on their mind.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-10 | mary.ssherr | 73 | view |
- The chart shows the proportion of graduates from Bluesky University in 2006 entiring different employment sectors 65
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 67
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think this a positive or negative development? 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the people') or simply say ''Most people''.
Suggestion: Most of the people; Most people
...nd give my view in these paragraphs. Most of people believe and get bad sights and situatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 406, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'event'?
Suggestion: event
...ecause, they are had an influenced last events or practices. For instance, my classmat...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, may, so, then, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 41.998997996 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88888888889 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46408421811 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.547225737 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.0476190476 106.682146367 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.7142857143 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04761904762 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227716198909 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758515514513 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440904297303 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140506012391 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518908760773 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.0946893788 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 50.2224549098 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.49 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.