Some people believe that it is a good idea to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views

Essay topics:

Some people believe that it is a good idea to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Some visionaries speak of a world in which sharing information in academic, scientific research and business is a nice idea, while others claim that some knowledge should not be shared due to high worthfulness. I will discuss both these views and explain why I agree that sharing academic, business and scientific knowledge is excellent. 54 words

Many argue that protecting professional information let their own company maximize profit. Non-shared business knowledge allows a certain firm to occupy its profit. For instance, Japanese famous company, Nisshine food industry, invented instant noodle named “Chicken ramen”. Other facts immediately imitated it and the profit of Nisshine became less and less. Thus, Nisshine prohibited other industries from selling instant noodle without permission of Nisshine or paying fee of its privilege in order to protect Nisshine’s profit. 76 words

Others, on the other hand, disagree pointing out that sharing scientific or academic research information develop or improve society. One notable example is business cycle model,insisting that enhancing and sharing academic research let society rise. For example, there are a lot of top research institutions in the US, and then the results of these institutions have large positive impact on US economy. This realizes number one GDP of the US in all over the world. What is more, it is said that distributing scientific knowledge (the reason of pest is contaminated situation of Europe cities) rescued a lot of people in Europe from the pandemic of pest. 108 words

As we have seen, there are no easy answers to this, with some people mentioning that some specific knowledge should not be shared to maintain their own companies profit, and others believing that sharing professional information allows society to be prosperous. However, I would agree with the latter opinion because the idea makes profit for public, not individual.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-24 benj212 61 view
2020-01-13 Mouaz1994 78 view
2020-01-09 mirolinquency 73 view
2020-01-08 wondertran 89 view
2019-12-28 Asma Shahin 84 view
Essays by user Keikei :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , insisting
... notable example is business cycle model,insisting that enhancing and sharing academic re...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ess cycle model,insisting that enhancing and sharing academic research let societ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, thus, while, for example, for instance, what is more, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46511627907 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92745515912 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58803986711 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1692050134 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332247711367 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103235153272 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106610274751 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210631813051 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11581720771 0.056905535591 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.