Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
The more researchers study one problem, the result of that is better. As they sharing their information, they can go more easier. Like the technology's development during the World War I and II. At that time, countries gather all professors to make weapons. However, we do not need to act as like we are doing war. Sharing for some information is good, but some information is not.
If information for public benefit is shared, it will make good result. Linux is a good example for this case. Linux is an operating system of computer, and it is not made by a company or one person. Actually, at the first time, one company have made the Linux, but they shared program code in online. They intent that anyone in the world could develop this program. This project succeeds. Until now, many people are involving to upgrade this program, and many people are using this program.
However, some information must be kept safety. It must be prohibited that Information for particular company or country. Result of scientific research or other information is one company's property and secret weapon for survive . It is like copyrights for musicians. Sometimes, such information's potential is better than money or stocks. If that information is unveiled, the company will demolish.
In my opinion, whether sharing of information is good or not, it must be decided by the information's purpose. Not only development of study is important, but also security of information is important too.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | benj212 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Mouaz1994 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | mirolinquency | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | wondertran | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Asma Shahin | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows how frequency people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffe and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countreis. 67
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. 61
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
... sharing their information, they can go more easier. Like the technologys development durin...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...roject succeeds. Until now, many people are involving to upgrade this program, and many peopl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s property and secret weapon for survive . It is like copyrights for musicians. So...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, so, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 41.998997996 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1238.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01214574899 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80351858228 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558704453441 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 20.2975951904 54% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.2698845795 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 58.9523809524 106.682146367 55% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.7619047619 20.7667163134 57% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.7619047619 7.06120827912 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262763102244 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078121042579 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887629845577 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175001281055 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664050301239 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 13.0946893788 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.31 50.2224549098 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.59 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.1190380762 63% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.