Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your

These days, there is a plethora of information on the Internet, and everyone can use them for their purposes. Many people argue that it is beneficial to share more needful information for general use, whilst others disagree and think that some valuable data should keep the confidence. It has long been my belief that some things are too essential to share on the Internet and other resources. This essay will discuss both viewpoints in more detail and summarize the main points in the end.
On the one hand, the supporters of this viewpoint provide numerous reasons in favour of their opinion. For example, school pupils everywhere need information such as facts, statistics, descriptions for educational goals. Of course, it is undeniable that open Internet sources already have a majority of appropriate data in themselves. However, there is a variety of things that is not on the websites.
On the other hand, the opponents of this abovementioned opinion present their respective points as well. For instance, the general public does not need scientific research details, advice for business, the complicated things in the academic world. The reason for this is that people will not use this information in real life. Moreover, a few people are interested in this direction, and many prefer to deal only with household problems. In addition, many important data cannot be presented to the public because it may be provocative and cause panic in society.
To conclude, human beings interact with different things, and they need some special knowledge from various sources. Nevertheless, this information should be filtered by the government for the benefit of the people, and other precious data should remain secret.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ctive points as well. For instance, the general public does not need scientific research detai...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, of course, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2238267148 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78642836509 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581227436823 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.5261086385 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.4666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208103394325 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633045573688 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581857058384 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121802475015 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761823903631 0.056905535591 134% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.