Some people believe that it is impossible to help everyone in need around the world. That is why governments should only focus on helping people of their own country. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and relevant examples.
In recent years, there is a common belief that the governments should not help people in other countries as there are problems in their own nation. While there is a strong case for this viewpoint, I am more inclined to the view that we should try to support disadvantaged people regardless of where they live.
On the one hand, those in favour of this opinion may state their reasons as follows. The first and foremost explanation would be that in most communities, even the wealthiest, there are people who are impoverished and disadvantaged. For instance, while Da Nang is among the fastest growing cities in Viet Nam, there are still the homeless and disabled left uncared. As long as there are people locally available needing help, it is critical to prioritise local charity. A further reasons lies in social pressure which would force the governments to support its citizens first.
On the other hand, I find it more convincing to believe that we should take measures to help those living beyond our national borders especially developing or underdeveloped countries. First of all, in some countries, the problems they are facing prove to be much more serious. Take Africa as an example. Not only does this continent suffer from dangerous diseases, most of people living there are also on such a low income that they hardly make ends meet. Moreover, even a small donation provided by international organizations can create a meaningful impact on those in need. For example, people suffered the loss of family members due to natural disaster such as tsunamis and earthquakes are left with broken hearts. In this case, empathy is far more helpful than financial aid.
In conclusion, although it is true that we cannot help everyone all around the world, I believe that national boundaries should not stop us from helping those in urgent needs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-04-06 | naquan2205 | 84 | view |
| 2017-01-15 | http_essay | 89 | view |
| 2016-09-27 | tajveer | 67 | view |
- Some think that buildings should be constructed with functionality in mind, as it is more important than design. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution, and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations.Some people say that government should try to reduce air traffic by taxi 67
- Nowadays more and more people read news on the internet However newspapers have most of important information sources of news Give your opinion from your experience and give examples 82
- Some think that buildings should be constructed with functionality in mind as it is more important than design To what extent do you agree or disagree 74
- Stress is now a major problem in many countries around the world.What are some of the factors in modern society that cause this stress, and how can we reduce it? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'believing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'convince' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: believing
...e other hand, I find it more convincing to believe that we should take measures to help th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...ntinent suffer from dangerous diseases, most of people living there are also on such a low inc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, may, moreover, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99677419355 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6930461189 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1331223623 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.266666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264509157447 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077043031088 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659899950301 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163161261793 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369846449504 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.