Some people believe that newspaper is the best way to learn about news. While others believe that more effective way is through other media. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, some argue that the best way to gain information is by the newspaper. At the same time, however, there is a body of opinion which claims that other media are more effective to acquire knowledge. In this essay I will examine both sides of the debate and seek a conclusion.
To begin with, it is undeniable that the information on the newspaper is professional, which is why some people consider it the most important way to access information. The reason is that reporters and editors in a newspaper company are well trained and they may collect news and compose it professionally. That is to say, they know how to organize their passages and allow their readers to understand them easily. For example, the public can readily know what is happening to astronomy due to the reader-friendly articles on the newspaper.
On the other hand, however, others contend that newspapers may transmit messages very slowly, since most emerging events can be accessed by readers on the newspaper the day after the events happen. Therefore, they think the internet is the most effective way to get information. This is because it enjoys fast speed and readers on it can receive news in a minute after the news occurs. For example, there is an earthquake arising in a country and this disaster can be spread quickly on the Internet and the netizen in another country can get to know within seconds.
To summarize, there is no doubt that the newspaper is professional and can help readers to understand news easily. At the same time, however, Internet is more effective than this medium. In the final analysis, therefore, one can only conclude that internet is the best way to broadcast news since most people want to know what is happening across the globe quickly.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-08-31 | ghikar | 61 | view |
2019-07-16 | tn.ngo296 | 89 | view |
2019-06-05 | Frank Chen | 61 | view |
2019-01-18 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
2019-01-18 | Frank Chen | 61 | view |
- The tables below give information about sales of Fair-trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. 67
- The chart below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. 67
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, may, second, so, therefore, well, for example, no doubt, to begin with, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87375415282 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73022600902 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485049833887 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7513615648 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.785714286 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207115986395 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732650890741 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542369847693 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138941425116 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511243848417 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.