Some people believe that newspaper is the best way to learn about news. While others believe that more effective way is through other media. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Newspapers had been the main source of news long before the advent of media reports. Others believed that it is still the best way to learn about the current events, while others argue that there are other media that can deliver the news effectively. This essay will review both arguments and discuss why other media is better.
With regards to newspapers, as mentioned earlier, it was the main source of news of our ancestors, so they have their trust on this type of news broadcasting. One of the pros of newspaper is that the news are detailed because the reporters and writers don't have a limit on how long they need to deliver the reports. Another is we don't need a special gadget, internet, and electricity to read the current headlines. There are also negative aspects on this, though. First, there is a one to two days delay in delivering the news because of the process of typing, editing, printing, delivering, and selling the papers. Second, it is expensive due to the prices of huge printing machines, papers, and the fee for the space in the paper. Third, and I think is the worst part, news blackout usually happens. This means that known people like politicians or business men can pay the news company to refrain them from printing news that may defaced their names or companies.
However, there are other media that can broadcast the news such as news report from televisions. these type usually convey the news on live, which means that people could see or read the events as they happen. Moreover, they can show interviews of certain people that are connected to any events to live television. But like in newspapers, news blackout could also happen.
Other type of media that I believed is the best way to deliver is through social media such as facebook and twitter that are mostly handled by personal accounts of individuals. Through these, common people share news that are not shown on national or international news and give their opinions which is almost impossible in newspapers or televisions. One example of this is the current news about the Amazon rainforest fire. There are no telecast about this on international news because of the said news blackout. However it got circulated by facebook and twitter users through social media so others were informed about this. What is more, almost every individual have cellphones now so these medias are easily accessible.
In conclusion, though newspapers are still a thing and can deliver detailed news, there are other medias that can distribute proper news. In the end, it is up to the people which one they prefer to get the news from.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-31 | ghikar | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-16 | tn.ngo296 | 89 | view |
| 2019-06-05 | Frank Chen | 61 | view |
| 2019-01-18 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-18 | Frank Chen | 61 | view |
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 73
- Some people believe that newspaper is the best way to learn about news. While others believe that more effective way is through other media. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 78
- Children nowadays watch significantly more television than in the past, which reduces their activity level accordingly. Why is this the case?What measure can you suggest to encourage higher level of activity among children? 78
- Today, in many countries, there is insufficient respect for old people. What are the reasons? What problem it might cause? How this socio-economic problem can be solved? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ailed because the reporters and writers dont have a limit on how long they need to d...
^^^^
Line 5, column 331, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d to deliver the reports. Another is we dont need a special gadget, internet, and el...
^^^^
Line 9, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s or companies. However, there are other media that can broadcast the news ...
^^
Line 9, column 99, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...s such as news report from televisions. these type usually convey the news on live, w...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 439, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'telecasts'?
Suggestion: telecasts
...he Amazon rainforest fire. There are no telecast about this on international news becaus...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 516, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...news because of the said news blackout. However it got circulated by facebook and twitt...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, moreover, second, so, still, third, while, i think, in conclusion, such as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2188.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 449.0 315.596192385 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87305122494 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4946647203 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478841870824 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 669.6 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8518586263 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1304347826 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5217391304 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21739130435 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328175949715 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930061814393 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09745501842 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210771176098 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130590907937 0.056905535591 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.