Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.
To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement?
It is undeniable today that people in the world have wide area of choices to select their basic and luxurious needs. In my opinion, I totally agree with this statement and I will introduce evidences supporting that.
First of all, the development of technology increases the choices of humans. In the last two decades, the invention of electric devices made the life easy and more reachable. For example, the computer, laptop, tablet, and smart mobile phone use for accessing to internet which provides methods to simulate the other’s idea. So, ideas invented in the North America spread to Asia during numerous hours. Moreover, the diversity of food these days has given the flexibility to choose what you like to eat or cook. Let us take the case of the menus in the restaurants of Saudi Arabia have many types of food such as Australian meat, American fast food, Russian salad, Italian salad, and seafood. As consequence, the diverse choices improve our selections and make our life more enjoyable.
Second argument supporting my position is the current technology makes the world likewise small village. The modern devices connect every corner in the world with each other. To illustrate my point, you can select item from china then during 10 days you will have it. As result, the wide range of selection increased in noticeable way in the last 15 years.
To sum up, many people think the choices increased these days. I stand with this statement and I believe the selections or choices for humanitarian will grow up in the near future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, likewise, moreover, second, so, then, for example, such as, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1291.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94636015326 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55674721049 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624521072797 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0809278817 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0666666667 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132815118202 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391927038047 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443157858166 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905694707757 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419895914069 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.