Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In the contemporary era, citizens have a wide range of chances related they can adopt has sparked heated controversy worldwide. Some compellingly argued that we have a sizeable number of selections in today's world. In my opinion, I totally concur with this viewpoint, and in this essay below, I will support my point of view with examples.
Initially, a reason why individuals have an array of choices to select from which they have instant access to their exigencies since technology has advanced. In other words, citizens can differentiate between their alternatives by seeking them on the internet. As a result, residents do not have difficulty searching for feasible options to attain their demands. This can be illustrated by the fact that the human race might opt to purchase any goods via online shopping websites or apps such as Tiki or Amazon that they are interested in and deliver those the next day.
Furthermore, our geriatric family members, as well as parents, will gradually alter their traditional perspectives. This means that awareness in the previous generation will deflate some modern tendencies in societies. In turn, they will not ban us from electing something they formerly prohibited us. Ergo, our generation has broader elections without the hindrance of anyone. A good illustration of this is youngsters now freely marry whom they are in love with, while the spouse of past adults has to be picked up by their elderly and mother and father.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that civilians have innumerable decisions. Nevertheless, I endorse the view that this opportunity, to have numerous selections to pick up, is brought by advancement equipment over and above convention shift.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- The charts show below what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 44
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 67
- The tables give information on the temperatures and hours of Daylight during the same week in December 2018 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, well, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24637681159 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94281420235 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659420289855 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6988664826 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.428571429 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153425896768 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498257492343 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410502114511 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0932153983706 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384185976677 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.