It has usually been believed that we have been surrounded by a wide diversity of opportunities during recent decades. I am of the opinion that this notion is utterly true, due to several possible arguments such as significant progress in communication, as well as the rapid expansion of technology.
To commence with, there has been an epic direct relation between the number of our choices and our situations in terms of communicating with other individuals all over the world, meaning that, vast numbers of opportunities could be suggested to us by other people living in other countries, which are possibly able to play a crucial role in enhancing the quality of our lives. Take great numbers of immigrants, for instance, they may be encouraged by others to immigrate to foreign countries in order to pursue their carriers or educations, therefore, they are able to select their destinations from a wide variety of choices resulting from a substantial communication among people living in different countries.
In addition to this, with the advent of advanced technologies or radical changes in searching tools, such as new websites on the Internet , social media, and all types of the Internet browsers, which have considerable influences on the number and power of our choices, we are able to choose wide range of products with high quality. Online shopping can be a good epitome of this matter since it can provide us with large numbers of products that we are looking for them, moreover, we can compare them on the Internet or social media, choose the best one in terms of quality and price, and purchase it even from remote companies. Nonetheless, providing such a large volume of opportunities in the market can lead us into being confused, this unpleasant situation can be ameliorated by reading all reviews written by other consumers about the quality of products.
To conclude, obviously, I admittedly believe that the number of our choices has substantially been increased by using all types of searching tools on the Internet or social media, besides communicating with foreign people.
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.You should write at least 250 words 67
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.You should write at least 250 words 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.You should write at least 250 words 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ls, such as new websites on the Internet , social media, and all types of the Inte...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, look, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12790697674 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9453411783 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546511627907 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 20.2975951904 212% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.5809262179 49.4020404114 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 220.5 106.682146367 207% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 43.0 20.7667163134 207% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 14.25 7.06120827912 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0933512969622 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443338464208 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.022606606073 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0548475700227 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017310388851 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.2 13.0946893788 185% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.1 11.3001002004 178% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.2 10.1190380762 190% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.