Some people believe that spending money on developing technology for space exploration is unjustifiable, and there are more beneficial ways to spend money. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, many hold the view that countries should provide financial aids for other aspects instead of space research. However, there is a body of opinion which claims that exploring the universe is necessary. In this essay I will discuss both sides of the debate to seek a conclusion.
To begin with, it is undeniable that it is not suitable for the government to invest money in outer space exploration, since there are numerous issues existing on Earth and requiring governments to spend money on solving them, such as environmental protection and poor-quality medical services. In addition, it is wiser for countries to pay close attention to improving living standard in the world. For example, nations should fund the education, which not only enables schools to have more budgets on purchasing advanced equipment, but also allows the poor students to receive formal education.
On the other hand, however, space exploration can help address energy crisis. This is because scientists may discover new kinds of energy in the universe and bring them back to the earth, which means that they can replace traditional fossil fuels to power machines. Furthermore, there is also a chance in a million that scientists find another planet hospitable to humans through the exploration and in this way, the problem of overpopulation can be tackled.
To summarize, there is no doubt that governments should pump money into the areas related to the conditions of people living on Earth. At the same time, nonetheless, space research can be considered a good way to deal with the problems on Earth. In the final analysis, therefore, one can only conclude that nations ought to allocate its budgets to the living standard and outer space exploration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-16 | dhanya sino | 61 | view |
- Schooling is no longer necessary, since more and more information is accessible on the Internet, and students can study just as well at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 56
- The tables below give information about sales of Fair-trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 67
- Now children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time doing sports. Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 61
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
Nowadays, many hold the view that countries should provide ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, for example, in addition, no doubt, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1514084507 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8038496045 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602112676056 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2990733118 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.916666667 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9166666667 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15835501973 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504953721272 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414099688046 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0861804233898 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385443032086 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.