Some people believe that technology causes more problems for modern society than it solves. Do you agree or disagree?
Many people argue that the public can be affected by bad information from detailed descriptions of crime scenes in the press and on television, so this should be limited in the media. I agree with this statement because of the following reasons.
First of all, detailed descriptions of crime scenes can have a bad influence on awareness of the young generation. Young people or even children nowadays use the internet as their main method of collecting information. And whenever they use that social media, some articles relating to killings, robberies or kidnaping appear, that kind of thing will raise curiosity and impulse them to act the same. Second, detailed descriptions of crime scenes may lead to excessive panic and anxiety for people with weak mentality. They may become anti-society, stay at home all the time, none talk to other people and do not trust the law and government anymore. This means, a group of people will be a burden for the country, they do not work and just rely on unemployment allowance to get by.
Third, detailed descriptions of crime scenes in newspapers and on TV against the morality of propaganda in transmitting information. In the morality of propaganda, journalists or television directors must avoid as much as they can about the contents which included violence actions, especially about the process that crimes occurred. But nowadays, it appears more and more to attract the attention of people. Last but not least, detailed descriptions of crime scenes may not be highly appreciated by other people or foreign media outlets. A newspaper that has a strong connection with cases like killings, robberies or kidnappings will be the cause of adverse effects on both tourism and the economy. Tourists feel fear of visiting this country for fear of being victimized in these crimes and many foreign companies will hesitate in investing into the country with such a chaotic society.
In conclusion, detailed descriptions of crime scenes in newspapers and on TV should be restricted in the media due to its disadvantages. Journalists or television directors should make a wise choice when publishing the news in order to create a better society, repel crimes and unite people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-28 | hieu13092006 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-12 | Albert Armin | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | letrang250191 | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | letrang250191 | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | ABCDE | 73 | view |
- The bar chart shows the information of the number of volunteers and paid workers in 4 different roles in the sports sector of an Australian town in 2015
- The picture illustrates how a medical centre changed after some developments in 2010 compared to 2008 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 73
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment because of the following reasons. First of all, detailed descriptions of c...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y on unemployment allowance to get by. Third, detailed descriptions of crime sc...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e country with such a chaotic society. In conclusion, detailed descriptions of ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, may, second, so, third, in conclusion, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1129476584 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88340936857 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539944903581 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3066879768 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6875 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.09295306819 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349734272919 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319662614811 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.053139922069 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386091213411 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment because of the following reasons. First of all, detailed descriptions of c...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y on unemployment allowance to get by. Third, detailed descriptions of crime sc...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e country with such a chaotic society. In conclusion, detailed descriptions of ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, may, second, so, third, in conclusion, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1129476584 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88340936857 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539944903581 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3066879768 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6875 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.09295306819 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349734272919 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319662614811 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.053139922069 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386091213411 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.