Many people argue that education has direction relation with the income in their life. Personally, I believe that university graduated students get high salaries than who have not. However, I don't think young people should pay full fees to get university graduation.
It is true that the students who go to university invest their valuable time of their life in study. To gain knowledge, skill and experience they have to give years in the university with professors and lecturers. For instance, to become a doctor or engineer students need to dedicate four to five years. In addition, they also need to pay high cost and their effort in study. As a result they get knowledge, skill and training required for high paid jobs. And they become an important asset of society.
On the other hand people argue that they have to pay full fees for education. However, i think if they have to pay expensive fee structure, it will deter young people to joining the university. There must be subsidy for talent and passionate students according to their academic merits. For instance, if a young school pupil wants to become a doctor in Nepal, it cots around half a million rupees. It will lead them to high debts in the future. If they get scholarships in education, they will serve the society and nation and also pay taxes to government later when they start to work.
In conclusion, it is obvious that young people who have invested their time and effort to gain professional knowledge earn more money. However, it is not acceptable that they should pay full expensive tuition fee to the university. Government and other sectors should provide aid to develop needful and skilled manpower for the country.
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table data below shows the top ten Internet users by country in 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 15 11
- The most important function of music is that it helps people reduce stress To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The table below shows percentage of students giving good ratings for different aspects of a university in China in 2000 2005 2010 73
- The maps below show the future plan about the Biology School in particular university 61
- The pie charts indicate changes in the proportions of energy produced in a country from 1983 to 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...aduated students get high salaries than who have not. However, I dont think young p...
^^^
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... salaries than who have not. However, I dont think young people should pay full fees...
^^^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...o pay full fees for education. However, i think if they have to pay expensive fee...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8724137931 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56233813038 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506896551724 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.465962751 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.5 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1111111111 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256750992082 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083852803827 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661317413977 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175639846602 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589737900254 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...aduated students get high salaries than who have not. However, I dont think young p...
^^^
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... salaries than who have not. However, I dont think young people should pay full fees...
^^^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...o pay full fees for education. However, i think if they have to pay expensive fee...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8724137931 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56233813038 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506896551724 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.465962751 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.5 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1111111111 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256750992082 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083852803827 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661317413977 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175639846602 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589737900254 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.