some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstance of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Many people debate that there should be fixed and defined punishment for any kind of crime to follow while, others claim that motivations and context of each individual crime must be pondered. In my opinion, each case should be analyzed separately and the equivalent punishment regarding the context of crime must be delineated.
On the one hand, defining fixed punishment for a certain crime could improve the transparency of judging and reduce the probability of corruption among the judges and juries. Delinquents cannot bribe to judges and tempt them to judge in favor of them. The consequence of their actions is clear and nobody can be exempted from that. Immutable punishment makes the process of judging shorter and faster and take the pressure off lawyers.
On the other hand, although strict punishment can make judging easily, it often causes unjust judgment. Sometime, people are led to commit a crime inadvertent which they do not have any control on that. With this in mind, people in these situations are not as guilty as who deliberately do something criminal. In addition, people could be manipulated and deceived by others who are the true delinquent ones. Children, for example, can be cheated to play a role in criminal activities.
In conclusion, each case has its own story that should be considered before judging. Without gathering all the information, identifying the true culprit is out of question. Sometimes, some elements such as the age of culprit, his mental status and the reasons of committing the crime, can alter the verdict completely.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-16 | sinanarimani | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-14 | sinanarimani | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-14 | sinanarimani | 61 | view |
| 2022-02-14 | sinanarimani | 61 | view |
| 2020-08-26 | panizzf | 67 | view |
- nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 67
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13618677043 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77016021965 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610894941634 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.414815878 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2857142857 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37064089443 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111817765928 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10956137382 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215656528028 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127159109764 0.056905535591 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.