Due to the increasment of crimes in today's world, many people debate about punishment of criminals. Some people say that every crime has to have its own standart punishment. However, there are some individuals who state that any background reasons of criminal should be taken into consideration. In this is say we are going to discuss please point of views.
Fixed punishment will make court process a lot quicker. In addition, all criminals would be treated equally, so no one will be offended or discriminated by public. Standardized punishments can be beneficial, since potential criminals would make up their minds. It could lead to the decreasment of crime numbers.
On the other hand, some of the criminals may not deserve punishments given to them. Others argue that the motives of crimen and the background of cminal should be taken into account. There must be diffrent punishment for, let's say, a killer who murders for their own pleasing and someone who was forced to kill for self-defense.
In conclusion, I would say that every crime should be considered as individual. Punishment for a crime should be based on all factors, not just based on the classification of crimes into types.
- Would you before to go to a small university in the countryside or a large university in the city 91
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land become less productive. The table shows how these couses affected three regions of the world during the 1990 couses of land degradation by region? 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technogy affected the types of relationships that people make?Has this been a positive or negative development? 56
- The bar chart below shows the main reasons for students choosing to study at a particular university in the UK in 1985 and 2005
- The graph shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...t of crime numbers. On the other hand, some of the criminals may not deserve punishments g...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld be taken into account. There must be diffrent punishment for, lets say, a kil...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, as for, as to, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1000.0 1615.20841683 62% => OK
No of words: 199.0 315.596192385 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02512562814 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90294857455 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 176.041082164 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623115577889 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 506.74238477 60% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.6193860932 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.9230769231 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3076923077 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417834078495 0.244688304435 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138621511117 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909095883626 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252516541627 0.151304729494 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720622211612 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.3 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.