some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. others, however, argue that the circumstanced of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it,should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
discuss both these views and give your own opinions
When we were children, our parents punished us for disobeying their orders and when we went to school, our teachers grounded us for ignoring school rules or forgetting or home works then when we grew up the authorities began to punish anyone who committed a crime according to the law.
Law is a list of rules and instruction that bring order and prevent chaos. Some people believe that this list must be fixed with no exceptions and that brings equality to the communities, but others argue that the circumstances of the crime have to be taken in consideration and that makes the law more flexible and suits any individual situation and they thought that brings justice to communities. In the following few paragraphs we are going to discuss those two contrasted opinions.
First, we are going to ask why some people think that punishments must be fixed without looking for the reason behind each crime? The people believe in this point of view think that a crime once committed it requires an act of punishment regardless the circumstances of it. They believe that this act makes everyone equal in front of law also they consider that there is no justification for any crime. For example: when a poor man robs a bank for getting money for his family this is not a proper excuse for committing this crime and he is a criminal anyway in front of the law. That brings us to the concept of equality which states that everyone is equal in law and every criminal must have their fair penalty.
In contrast, others argue that punishments must be special for each individual case because, sometimes crimes are committed by accident or out of vengeance so, in those types of cases the accused has to be treated by mercy. If a person murdered someone for killing his mother according to this point of view this person may not be fair to accuse him of murder. His punished will differ from anyone who commits crimes in purpose. Other example: when people do something wrong by accident without intention to harm anyone like car accidents in this case also mercy with this people should be a priority in judgment.
At the end of this paragraph, I assume that punishments need to be flexible not rigid to suit all the cases and to fulfill the meaning of justice but authorities should intensively monitor this flexibility to make it always within the rational limits to fulfill the meaning of equality.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-19 | Nesma.Zayan | 61 | view |
- it is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sports or music and others are not. it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician. discuss both these views and giv 56
- some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. others, however, argue that the circumstanced of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it,should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishme 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 568, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... accidents in this case also mercy with this people should be a priority in judgment...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, first, if, look, may, so, then, as to, for example, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 7.30460921844 301% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 51.0 24.0651302605 212% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1980.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 418.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73684210526 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58425034674 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495215311005 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.9 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.8377305299 49.4020404114 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.428571429 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8571428571 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36277987048 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124241506236 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863186237068 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185031176662 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753740671605 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.