Some people believe that university education should focus on the skills of employment for the future. Others think they should focus on academic study only. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Many hold a belief that tertiary education should train more professionally about practical skills of future career paths; while opponents argue that university curriculums should focus on academic and theoretical knowledge only. To the best of my knowledge, both points of view are grounded for the following reasons.
Firstly, it is note-worthy that practical skills are one of the prerequisites to have a promising job in contemporary society . Nowadays, many studies have shown that although it is invisible, the increasing pressure of fierce competition has resulted in the higher demand for other skills like problem-solving or management. For instance, in many famous companies like Big Four, one of the outstanding financial companies in the world where graduates with numerous internship experiences are sought-after by employers. As a result, they could not only give them a chance to get a better job but also improve their ability to tackle problems in social life.
Secondly, the counter-argument raised by objectors to this is that higher education should only pay attention to academic study, because this is the most solid background for career development. This argument could be true to some extent; however, it is incomplete. What they fail to take into account is the fact that the theoretical and practical skills are closely intertwined in one way or another. In other words, if people are not taught academic skills, they would not understand and concentrate on courses at university, which can affect their performances on future careers.
In conclusion, universities or colleges should continuously maintain the skills of employment and not overlook the significance of academic knowledge as mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-02 | manhdataim | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-16 | maiphuong0610 | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-16 | maiphuong0610 | 78 | view |
- Some people argue that holding sporting events is beneficial to countries development However other people hold the opposite opinion Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- the maps show changes between 1960 and now in the station street 84
- The table shows the change in the number of cinemas in different regions in a European country between 2004 and 2009 89
- In some countries around the world men and women are having children at a later age than in the past What are the reasons for this development What are the effects on society and family life 89
- The chart below gives information about the high speed continuous Internet connection of households in five countries in 2001 and 2002 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many holds'.
Suggestion: Many holds
Many hold a belief that tertiary education should...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 126, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... a promising job in contemporary society . Nowadays, many studies have shown that ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4776119403 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13992844623 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623134328358 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8930557512 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.454545455 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9090909091 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318926007869 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946810187318 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643836936471 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17884180638 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613143135695 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.