Some people believe that university education should focus on the skills of employment for the future. Others think they should focus on academic study only. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is sometimes argued that universities should have an emphasis on employment skills to prepare for the future while others think they have better to teach academic subjects only. Although focusing only on the academic study has several benefits, it is my belief that concentrating on teaching employment is more beneficial.
Admittedly, sustainable knowledge about certain fields could be regarded as the major benefit of teaching academic subjects. From an educational perspective, when principal give a higher status to intellectual teaching in school curriculum, learners’ imagination and creativity as well as concentration and logical thinking can be encouraged. Such an advantage can also mean that if educational institution offers more academic courses and intellectual subjects, their students can advance in terms of general knowledge and experience of the world when they reach adulthood. National economic university in Vietnam, for example, where a large number of students have a broad view of life and personal resources because of politics emphasizing academic fields.
However, in my point of view, concentrating on teaching employment skills can obviously bring more advantages due to relationships and job promotion when learners go in life. On a personal level, the focus instead on teaching and learning skills for employment could contribute to the fact that learners can advance in terms of social skills and expand relationships, which can lead to an improved quality of spiritual life. On the societal level, it is potential for educational authorities to incorporate working skills into school timetables, which means the young can be provided higher job opportunities and therefore a well-paid job, career progression, and an improved quality of material life.
In conclusion, it seems to me that focusing on employment skills in the university can bring greater benefits than academic subjects only. It is thus hoped that educational authorities can make an informed decision about changing the universities curriculum to emphasize the training for employment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-02 | manhdataim | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-16 | maiphuong0610 | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-16 | maiphuong0610 | 78 | view |
- Some people think learning history in school is important Others think learning subjects more relevant to life is important Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people believe that university education should focus on the skills of employment for the future Others think they should focus on academic study only Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 636, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...iversity in Vietnam, for example, where a large number of students have a broad view of life and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'universities'' or 'university's'?
Suggestion: universities'; university's
...an informed decision about changing the universities curriculum to emphasize the training fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67301587302 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15071968247 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546031746032 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.5695960121 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.454545455 106.682146367 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6363636364 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248992326397 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102853083502 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678556698202 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175132018172 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087869646866 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.2 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 636, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...iversity in Vietnam, for example, where a large number of students have a broad view of life and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'universities'' or 'university's'?
Suggestion: universities'; university's
...an informed decision about changing the universities curriculum to emphasize the training fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67301587302 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15071968247 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546031746032 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.5695960121 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.454545455 106.682146367 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6363636364 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248992326397 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102853083502 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678556698202 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175132018172 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087869646866 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.2 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.