Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).
To what extend do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that high school programmes should include compulsory unpaid community services, such as working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or training sports for kids surrounding them. I completely agree with this idea.
First of all, students at high school need to understand their responsibilities to social. At the age of sixteen, they could have legislative responsibilities to what they do. They should also share their knowledge, experiences that they have learned at the school to support developing communities. For instance, schools might organize some environmental programmes, such as cleaning the streets or promote for environmental protection. These actions can positively inspire everyone. So, non-profit communities services need to add in to high school programmes. Secondly, taking part in unpaid community services can help students prepare their experiences to further actions that are good for their future. They can learn a lot of soft skills from the activities that they do, such as team working, planning. Some sport training classes that they teach for younger children may help themselves being stronger, limiting the sedentary lifestyle that many young people have. My younger sister and her classmates enjoy teaching badminton for street children at the weekend, so they are always happy and have much positive energy. Thus, unpaid community services bring to students at high school many advantages.
In conclusion, I believe that high school should be forced to add unpaid community services to their programmes as volunteer activities, developing the neighbourhood or teaching kids playing some sports because high school students need to have responsibilities to social, and they also get many benefits from those activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 896, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to be' or 'be'.
Suggestion: to be; be
...or younger children may help themselves being stronger, limiting the sedentary lifest...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62686567164 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02331844902 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567164179104 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.2507787283 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.714285714 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383003365084 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124439774763 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0995394083988 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290622896509 0.151304729494 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484980681838 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.