Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In order to help students to stay connected with the community, many people think the activities related to charity or society must be involved in the curriculums of high schools. From my perspective, I totally advocate this point of view because of two main rationales.
Firstly, these unpaid community services help students to nurture their morality. To be more specific, by involving in charity activities, they are able to understand the difficulties of people who are in need. Therefore, they could show their kindness and generosity toward others, which are necessary to become decent persons. Moreover, students also can have many valuable experiences through these activities, so that they would develop a sense of responsibility to solve existing problems in the community. As a result, they could find the right motivations to study better in schools, becoming more responsible to society. According to scientific research, since British tertiary systems required students to join at least three social activities before their graduations, the study performances as well as the well-being of learners improved significantly.
Secondly, having chances to make new friends and relationships is one of the most benefits that could be reaped from these social activities. As some activities such as repairing houses or delivering free meals for poor people need the cooperation of many volunteers, therefore, students are likely to meet peoples from other backgrounds. Because of that, they could build up their relationships widely which is an important factor contributing to their success in the future. In addition, these activities can also help them to learn many soft-skills by interacting with people. For instance, teaching children can help them to learn how to communicate well to transfer their opinions or working with others helps to develop teamwork skills. These soft-skills makes student become more energetic and would be the competitive edges in the job market.
In conclusion, high schools need to add unpaid community services into their curriculums. It not only nurtures morality but also helps to build up relationships and gain valuable skills.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, at least, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49107142857 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99585024547 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589285714286 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0264725925 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.3125 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128850567825 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441761692321 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501398420403 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0834063259332 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173345262067 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.