Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood, or teaching sports to younger children).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Voluntary work can bring numerous benefits for students, such as improving their soft skills, which will help them easily manage tasks in their careers subsequently. In addition, it will help students appreciate more values in their lives. Therefore, in my opinion, high school programs should include volunteerism as a part of their education.
If students participate in community work, they will have opportunities to meet people of different ages, genders, and even cultures. As a result, communication is one of the first skills they learn to get along with the other volunteers. And to get tasks done well, they will learn to cooperate with people and to deal with difficult situations, from which they will gain teamwork skills and problem-solving skills. When helping people, they will see how hard it is for the disabled to overcome their disabilities or how the homeless children wish for a happy home, leading to more awareness of money and labour. Moreover, they will realise they are lucky when they have parents who support them not only physically but also emotionally. So they should show more respect and love for them. In addition, apart from learning hours, students usually spend time on their mobile phone or computer to go online or to chat with their friends, consequently lacking physical activities, causing eyes to strain. Thus, while doing community jobs, they have to work with physical or mental activities that make them healthier and more creative.
Admittedly, there are some negatives to volunteering; for example, it is time-consuming, does not earn money, and volunteering abroad may lead to homesickness. Nevertheless, students can choose suitable times and distances to join in, as one positive experience could change their outlook on life.
To sum up, taking part in unpaid community work brings young people various knowledge of the real world and life skills, which help them mature and know how to tackle personal issues well.
- Some claim that studying abroad has greater benefits for a student s home country To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You sho 78
- Some people think that offenders should be put in prison Others however believe that providing offenders with education and training is more effective than putting them in prison Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, apart from, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33439490446 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9999949288 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624203821656 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0960992023 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.642857143 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5 7.06120827912 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131225255663 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506750734074 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432495411442 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0821063101724 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213464468347 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.