Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It can not be denied that unpaid community services have a good impact on high school students. While many people argue that they should be included in required programmes at school, I partly disagree with this notion due to pupils' different hobbies and conditions.
On the one hand, the idea of making voluntary activities a compulsory option in high school programmes is reasonable to some advantages. Firstly, unpaid work can help students nurture their kindness. Many pupils realize when they join in charity programmes, they gradually feel that helping other people is their new motivation and from then, they give more value to the community. Another reason is unpaid community services improve the team working skills of participants. Only by combining smoothly between students can a voluntary campaign be successful. For instance, a blood donation campaign needs many different tasks and if students work independently, the rest is easy to fail.
Despite the above-mentioned advantages, I believe that those activities shouldn’t be compulsory in school programmes because it also based on many factors like hobbies and conditions. The first reason for this is there are not always many students who love voluntary work. If they are forced to do something they don’t like, the goal of these activities can be counterproductive. Besides, many pupils have a preference to find a job that helps them make a living because of their poor financial conditions. For that reason, making them do something freely is not a good idea for their education.
In conclusion, although unpaid community services are a good choice to be included in high school programmes it will be far more meaningful if they are done voluntarily.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | phannhi1511@ | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Nhi3132006 | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | thuyan187 | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | ankhanhvien | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | trangiangtie | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 604, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...stance, a blood donation campaign needs many different tasks and if students work independentl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, so, then, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33455882353 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0278564504 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573529411765 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0013736022 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.642857143 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244930248699 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862532919839 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537338546988 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161123933058 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427466435288 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.