Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is thought that it should be mandatory for the young, especially high school students, to engage in unpaid social activities. Looking from my perspective, I partly agree with this idea for several reasons.
On the one hand, the disadvantages of requiring students to take part in community services are in plant sight. The most obvious reason is that they might consume a great amount of time for unpaid jobs. Undoubtedly, they have to set aside their free time to learn knowledge, skills so that they can be qualified enough to provide aid to other people. However, hectic people do not have enough time for voluntary activities, which leads to the lack of time for relaxation and some mental issues or even bad academic achievements. In addition, some organizations can take advantage of volunteers to cater to their own benefits. For example, medical companies used to ask the young to distribute flyers about raising health awareness but this is also an effective way to advertise for their products.
On the other hand, there are some positive effects that volunteers can experience. Apparently, Social activities would bring a spirit of dedication and responsibility because helping other people enables volunteers to sympathize and have a more insight into predicaments of underprivileged people. Therefore, they can enhance moral development and become empathic citizens. Furthermore, these activities will benefit their future careers. Nowadays, recruiters value candidates who have participated in volunteer programs because they are thought to have gained hands-on experience and social skills, giving them a better chance of having those certificates on their resumes.
In conclusion, while there are some drawbacks to forcing students to take part in charity work such as wasting time and being used, they are surpassed by the benefits which are good for future careers and better morality.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | phannhi1511@ | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Nhi3132006 | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | thuyan187 | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | ankhanhvien | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | trangiangtie | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, furthermore, however, if, look, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37333333333 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8982446795 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0701322935 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.142857143 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198458424795 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679167998837 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617207231821 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137544929165 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759548950209 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.