When we are witnessing traveling boom across the world, cultural conflicts, more or less, spring up in each country. Still, some people insist that it is the host country's obligations to show its tolerance and warm welcoming to travelers, while others emphasis the importance of following local traditions. Therefore, this essay will give some explanations of both views and give the reason why we should obey local rules.
Top tourist attractions should respect and remain to be open minded and adaptive to all nations. Taking cultural differences into consideration, tourism countries should launch preparations to cater to tourists. What's more, travelers make great contributions to national tourism industry through impressive consumptions. Therefore, tourists deserve to enjoy their privilege in doing what they like.
Some people argue that respect is mutual and equal. With no regards of regional customs, people who only follow their usual ways and disobey local rules are regarded as egotism. Taking Singapore for example, rubbish clarification, to maintain its eco-system, is strictly followed up. What if tourists throw their trash around this tiny city? There are, nevertheless, harsh punishments being imposed. That is to say obedience is conducive to the ties between tourists and the hit attractions.
Personally speaking, I think there must be some reason behind local customs and behavior. When we are traveling to tourism countries, it provides great chances to experience the differences. Why couldn't we just constraint our daily behaviors to adopt another new ones? Not only it shows our respect for local people, but also enables us to have an impressive experience.
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behavior. Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 84
- TPO 26: It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ jobs. 80
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both views and gi 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ys obligations to show its tolerance and warm welcoming to travelers, while other...
^^
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es into consideration, tourism countries should launch preparations to cater to t...
^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...unch preparations to cater to tourists. Whats more, travelers make great contribution...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 467, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s conducive to the ties between tourists and the hit attractions. Personally s...
^^
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...nces to experience the differences. Why couldnt we just constraint our daily behaviors ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, while, for example, i think, more or less, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52692307692 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87221694472 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.692307692308 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4638255516 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5294117647 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2941176471 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35294117647 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256725716428 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063214175337 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749015714967 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139519934256 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0888468359238 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.2 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.