There has been a longstanding controversy as to whether or not children’s occupation should be closely tied up to what their parents have had themselves submitted in their lifetimes. The opinions are now polarized in regard of this hot topic. Many people tend to think there are many benefits to be gained from a similar employment background to their parents, while others render this idea as absurdity. From my own perspective, I believe picking a job that is similar to what our parents do for living might give additional advantages to children.
One of the most obvious benefit is that children will avoid detours given that their parents are very familiar with what are the obstacles and remindful of those potential challenges. Unlike those who have a fresh start on a bumpy road ahead, children, under the guidelines which could be unattainable for a while, will start with certain advantages to smooth their way out. For example, a surgeon who has done thousands of operations would not find anyone better than his own child if he is willing to give all of what he has learnt during his entire career. It is not hard to imagine that the effects will be maximized when he wants to greasing the wheels of his own child. However, the hypothesis has to be based on one premises that of which his children must be a doctor.
In sharp contrast, children whose job is entirely different to their parents ‘may faces lots of challenges without help from the people who are likely to be the most reachable, reliable and trustworthy. Parents are often failed to give out advices and incapable of understand what their kids are struggling for. In the long run, both parents and children are becoming alienated to each other as they have less and less in common.
To put everything in a nutshell, children with exacting jobs that shares no similarity to their parents’ are often for this reason having a less exacting future success compare to those whose jobs are almost as if inherited are seen as eggs in an incubator.
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both views and gi 89
- TPO 26: It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ jobs. 80
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behavior. Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: WHETHER[4]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; whether or not; as to whether
...ere has been a longstanding controversy as to whether or not children's occupation should be cl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 436, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r as they have less and less in common. To put everything in a nutshell, childre...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rited are seen as eggs in an incubator.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, while, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 350.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68008528649 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565714285714 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.387382735 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.307692308 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9230769231 20.6045352989 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.61538461538 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342133467022 0.236089414692 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114991868038 0.076458572812 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0923290395728 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232598428403 0.150856017488 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749481443249 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.