Some people believe that when designing a building, the most important thing to be considered is the function rather than the appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that the functions of a building count more than its exterior. I totally agree with this opinion.
On the one hand, there is no doubt that aesthetically designed buildings can bring about many commercial values. Firstly, buildings which are well-designed are likely to attract more attentions. For example, customers will definitely go for a glamorous restaurant to wine and dine their business partners rather than a dreary one. Likewise, people are still standing in line to see monuments such as Taj Mahal, Effiel tower, Pisa tower and Buckingham palace without paying thorough attention about the functional aspect of these buildings. In addition, the outward appearance of a building should be taken into consideration so that the building can blend into its surroundings. What will happen if you build a modern mansion among the old garden or a Chinese traditional pavilion above the modern building? Chances are you will get enormous complaints and resentments.
On the other hand, “Form follows function” becomes one of the most famous maxims (châm ngôn) in the contemporary architecture for a reason. Architectures have to design a building in a way that satisfies its practical uses. For instance, a movie goer goes to the cinema not to observe the magnificent façade of the cinema but to watch a movie, so the theater is supposed to have a well-designed sound system and a scientifically-arranged hall so that everyone in the audience can conveniently enjoy their favourite movies.
In brief, while both appearances and function play a pivotal role in architecture, when it come to the indispensable one, function comes first.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-06-10 | MinhNgoc 299 | 73 | view |
- Some people think a job not only provides income but also a social life Others think it is better to develop social life with people you do not work with Discuss both view and give your opinion 77
- International travel can make people prejudiced rather than broad minded Why people fail to benefit when they travel What we can do to improve their understanding of the countries they visit 88
- Nowadays more and more young people hold the important positions in the government. Some people think that is a good thing while others argue that it is not suitable. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 74
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies. To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements? What measures can be taken to protect them? 89
- In the future, it seems more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planet to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h a movie, so the theater is supposed to have a well-designed sound system and a ...
^^
Line 3, column 524, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e can conveniently enjoy their favourite movies. In brief, while both appearance...
^^
Line 4, column 92, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comes'?
Suggestion: comes
...a pivotal role in architecture, when it come to the indispensable one, function come...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, likewise, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in brief, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26691729323 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22121664038 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665413533835 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.384769539078 520% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.6496625257 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.769230769 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1538461538 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140544515246 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04732498344 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0184615775529 0.0667982634062 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0841234070664 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189235604903 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.