It is argued by scientists that whether they should get in touch with living beings on other planets via sending messages. Some believe it is a good idea whereas other believe that it could be harmful. I support the later notion because the life forms on other planets cannot be trusted.
On one hand, contacting with living beings on other planets can open doors to invent new things. When one would be in touch with them, it can develop friendly relationship among them and together they can work in achieving bigger targets. As these beings are supposed to have extra powers, their help would be extremely beneficial. For instance, an article published in The Times read about the invention of time machine by taking help from such creatures. Therefore, it would be wise to work with them
On the other hand, as they are supposed to be super intelligent, contacting them can be uber dangerous because they cannot be trusted. Because of their powers, they can make people fool and put them in immense trouble. Furthermore, if they get annoyed by humans, their rage can be unbearable and one cannot anticipate their response. So, one can fall in cumbersome situation due to them. For example, many hollywood movies depict such behaviour of these creatures.
To conclude, although contacting other intelligent life forms on this planet can be advantageous, they cannot be trusted for one do not know their instincts.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1187.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 239.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96652719665 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57792881724 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560669456067 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1983391217 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3076923077 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3846153846 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294731509522 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117964990725 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767126383172 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212299578841 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512067227649 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.