some people belive that schools should only teach children subjects which are benefitcial to their future career and therefore other subjects such as music and sports are not important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, many individuals assume that teenagers should be only taught necessary subjects which are supportive to their future jobs. While I believe that the youth should concentrate on certain subjects which have direct impact on their future plans, I would argue that teachers should not only teach them those subjects.
To begin with, there are several obvious advantages that youngsters could receive if they focus on their important subjects. First and foremost, since standardised test such as entrance exams for undergraduate degree require specific subjects, adolescence who concentrate on those subjects would have better grades than the others who slack off and have ignorance. Consequently, they might get opportunities to go into a reputed university, which helps them well prepare their future careers. In addition, the community has set students who achieved high academic attainments as a role model for youngsters, thus teenagers who try to meet social’s expectation would gain respects from others.
However, children who have been taught only several certain subjects could receive negative impact. Firstly, only knowledge from a few subjects might prevent students from being well-rounded and have comprehensive development. For instance, a lack of theoretical and empirical knowledge in sports could reduce teenagers’ health. Secondly, there are a considered number of students who are talented at specific areas not in those academic curriculum such as football or music. Therefore, schools with a few necessary subjects might prevent them from being in pursuit of ideal plans which fit their strengths.
In summary, while certain subjects are benefits to students to follow academic career, I disagree with the idea that schools should only teach those subjects.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, in summary, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66420664207 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8374488298 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586715867159 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0718105406 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.916666667 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06120827912 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245479689605 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958261849758 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689479892278 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174812615098 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653077562724 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.