Some people think the cheap air flight gives ordinary people more freedom. However, others think the cheap air flight should be banned because its pollutes the air and brings many other problems. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
These days, it is universally acknowledged that inexpensive air flight provides more opportunities for ordinary people. In contrast, other ideas assume that it pollutes the air and brings several problems. While air pollution and other issues are clearly caused by cheap flight, I would argue that it should not be banned.
To begin with, there are some certain disadvantages which are caused by cheap air flight. Since the standard quality of planes which are used for cheap air flight are not as modern as others using for expensive air flight, the exhaust fumes which contain mainly carbon dioxide that cheap air flight produce might be high. As a result, the green house might be exaggerated. Additionally, the amount of cheap air flight have an upward trend in the current time, and air travels consume a huge amount of fuel for each flight. This might lead to a fuel resource shortage. Finally, because the technology using for cheap travel is not the latest, sound which is made by each plane might be excessive to become noise pollution.
However, I believe that cheap air flight provides more freedom for ordinary people. Firstly, due to the inexpensive price, low and medium-income individuals could have more choices when making travel. If there is no cheap air flight, ordinary citizens have to choose other means such as trains or cars which are not as safe as air travel. Secondly, due to an increasing amount of cheap flight each day, individuals could travel at any time which is proper for them.
In summary, while inexpensive flight certainly contribute to air pollution and other issues, I would argue that it should be managed by any appropriate rule but not a ban.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast, in summary, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 41.998997996 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96830985915 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55602518165 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517605633803 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3832076515 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.785714286 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409961958329 0.244688304435 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16937530811 0.084324248473 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106604158795 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283942682438 0.151304729494 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590862786189 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.