Innumerable advances are being in the field of science and medicine. But the animals are the prime victims of the experiments of new products. Some group of people argue that using them for the experiments is doing injustice to them. Before commenting on my opinion, I would provide the reasons for this purpose and the alternatives, if there are any, in the further paragraphs.
To begin with, since the past 100 years, scientists test drugs and cosmetics on animals like apes and guinea pigs. These animals have similarities with human being, so the medicines are tested on them to ensure that no human being will be harmed. For instance, if a drug is invented for a new disease it is examined on the lab animals. The effects or the side-effects they go through determines whether the med is fit for humans or not. According to researches the effects will be equivalent on humans. If the drug passes all the tests they release it in the market or else they design another formula. Opponents of such research argue that humans have no right to subject animals to this kind of trauma, and that the lives of all creatures should be respected. They believe that the benefits to humans do not justify the suffering caused, and scientists should use substitutes.
On the flip side, reliable proxies to animal experimentation are hardly available. Supporters think that a certain amount of discomfort on the part of rodents and monkeys can be justified if human lives are saved. They argue that opponents of such research might feel differently if any of their family members suffer from any nun tested drug.
To put in a nutshell, I disagree with the banning of animal testing for medicinal products, it is a necessary evil in such cases. It seems to me that it would be wrong to ban on animals for vital medical research until equally effective alternatives have been developed.
- Nuclear power is a necessary evil despite the potential human and environmental consequences as radioactive fallouts nuclear energy is a genuine alternative to non renewable energy sources like oil and coal Which are quickly running out In short the benef 95
- Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefit of human beings while other people argue that it is wrong Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Solar energy is becoming more and more popular as a source of household energy in many countries around the world Why is this What are the advantages and disadvantages of solar energy 81
- Do you believe that experimentation on animals for scientific purposes is justified Are there any alternatives to animal experimentation 89
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, for instance, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82352941176 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68922831511 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56346749226 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6644500995 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.6470588235 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88235294118 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260182545343 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763389887402 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051308352853 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149121486441 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390875973748 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.