Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. The say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste.
Write at least 250 words.
A number of individuals state that the amount of domestic waste recycled is still inadequate. According to them, the only route to promote recycling is done by the authorities through imposing laws and legislation to make it compulsory for everyone. To a certain extent, I advocate this point of view.
On one hand, it is fair to say that the laws play an instrumental role in raising the amount of recycled wastage . Firstly, as recycling waste has been projected as optional, many people and even big firms tend to overlook the importance of such process and simply proceed to dump garbage carelessly. By imposing harsh penalties, I believe that such indifferent attitude will change for the better. Secondly, the money generated from fining those who violate the rules can be used as funds allocated for green campaigns to further encourage people to recycle whenever possible. The combination of two measures, in the long term, can make people more careful in their handling with household trash.
On the other hand, I reckon that imposing legislation is not the only answer. To begin with, there are still many disadvantaged families whose members are still illiterate and ill-educated . With the current shortage of personnel for informing these people, relying solely on financial punishment to force them can put them in a precarious position and cause social conflicts. For that reason, I believe that education should be placed at the heart of the efforts to raise awareness of benefits of recycling. For instance, teachers should teach children to put inorganic waste in recycling bins. As children are the future of humanity, this platform can lead to a radical change in the current throwaway society that people are living in.
In conclusion, I believe that there are different avenues to get more waste recycled and making recycling one of the legalities is only an option.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-10 | BlackDelta | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | WritingPra | 84 | view |
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 78
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In many nations, people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units, instead of a large, extended family. Is this a positive or negative trend? 84
- the table below shows the expenditures of four car companies in the UK in 2002. 78
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...n raising the amount of recycled wastage . Firstly, as recycling waste has been pr...
^^
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... from fining those who violate the rules can be used as funds allocated for green...
^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rs are still illiterate and ill-educated . With the current shortage of personnel ...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'firstly', 'if', 'look', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'still', 'for instance', 'i reckon', 'in conclusion', 'to begin with', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.222873900293 0.247107183377 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.181818181818 0.155533422707 117% => OK
Adjectives: 0.105571847507 0.0946595960268 112% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0322580645161 0.0501214627716 64% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0322580645161 0.0437548338989 74% => OK
Prepositions: 0.140762463343 0.122226691241 115% => OK
Participles: 0.0615835777126 0.0403226058552 153% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.75690961487 2.80594681477 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0439882697947 0.0326793684256 135% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0879765395894 0.0861772015684 102% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0205278592375 0.021408717616 96% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00879765395894 0.011925033212 74% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1898.0 1933.35771543 98% => OK
No of words: 312.0 316.048096192 99% => OK
Chars per words: 6.08333333333 6.12580529183 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20517956788 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.378205128205 0.374742101984 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.310897435897 0.28420135186 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.217948717949 0.203846283523 107% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.150641025641 0.137316102897 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75690961487 2.80594681477 98% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.037074148 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580128205128 0.56093040696 103% => OK
Word variations: 63.4006312166 60.7387585426 104% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0891783567 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.8 20.7743622355 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4563049461 49.517814964 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.533333333 127.492653851 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.7743622355 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.866666666667 0.814263465372 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.99599198397 75% => OK
Readability: 51.8897435897 49.1944974215 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.72619047619 1.69124875643 102% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.563309241412 0.332605444948 169% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0728824725693 0.102741220458 71% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0448954207822 0.0668466124924 67% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.516215572027 0.534860350844 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.166445844755 0.148594505496 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.223191302921 0.134430193775 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804610881386 0.0742795772207 108% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.402401607215 0.324371583561 124% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0561255465667 0.0638462369009 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.410431943838 0.228012699653 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061160489082 0.058150111329 105% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.68436873747 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.41683366733 29% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 5.90881763527 85% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 2.5751503006 272% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.4468937876 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.