Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of old houses in local areas. Others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
There are opposing views regarding how new houses should be styled. While some people believe that these buildings should conform to the style set by old houses in the area, others show advocacy towards homeowners’ freedom of choice. Both views, along with my opinion, will be elaborated on in the following essay.
On one hand, there are reasons why new houses should resemble the style established by older buildings. Forefront among these is the aesthetic appeal and sense of identity similar architectural styles bring to an area. This could be seen in the case of the old quarter in Hanoi. As this two-storey housing compound gains widespread recognition for its nostalgic charm, the appearance of a towering office building in the middle of the area is unlikely to be welcome. Furthermore, if houses share the same style, they may incubate a sense of solidarity and uniformity among residents. This is because accommodation is often perceived as a status symbol; thus, having houses similar to others’ makes people more relatable in the eye of their neighbors.
On the other hand, some people contend that homeowners should build houses how they see fit. The strongest argument for this view is that people have the rights to express themselves, even in their choice of housing style. Ultimately, a house is only worth living if the owner is content with it. Moreover, old houses may fail to adhere to safety requirements. There seems to be an increasing weight of evidence to emphasize the increasing fragility and vulnerability of old houses, which makes their architectural styles less ideal to adopt in modern times.
On a balance, I agree that while people are entitled to build houses of their own style, they should contemplate the overall style of the area and ensure safety requirements are met.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-25 | Phạm Phú Trường | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | Invisible | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-07 | hangduan94@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-17 | n0air9x9 | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-17 | n0air9x9 | 89 | view |
- The table below shows expenditures of four car companies in the UK in 2002 89
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 64
- Today food travels from thousands of miles from the farm to the consumer. Some people say that it would be better for the economy & environment if people ate food produced from local farmers.Would the advantages of this idea outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Convenience food will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation?To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, thus, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10666666667 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78861973026 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576666666667 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7188991211 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.133333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13333333333 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.453547381952 0.244688304435 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148898124594 0.084324248473 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917266225224 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304138696599 0.151304729494 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420117576223 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.