Some people clean that too much focus and resources have been spend two protect wild animal and birds do you agree or disagree.
The table below show the spending of people on various items of five countries in 2001.
It is believed by few individuals that pay too much attention as well as resources have been spend for the protection of wild animals and birds. I totally agree with this aforementioned statement and I will articulate it in my upcoming paragraphs.
To commence with, there are some benefits when people spend much focus and resources to protect world life. First and foremost, it helps to boost humans mental memories and knowledge. In other words, in modern era, everyone busy in their lifestyles schedule they have not enough time to spend with others. In this case, when people go to the zoo they can explore the environment and also take a break from their screens, such as mobile phones, computers and televisions. To epitome, it is conducted in survey that 72% individuals undergo the zoos and gain knowledge related wild animals.
Further, strengthening my view point, animals and birds are parts of eco system. That's why the protection of wild animals is must and pivotal because food chain does not work without these animals. For instance, Lion always eat other animals, if it extinct then food chain can be ommited. In this situation, the zoo's protection necessary for animals. Apart from that, if the animal zoo every month updated with new resources than it can be make a good destination spot for people.
To recapitulate, in my opinion uppdates zoo's also beneficial for alternatives because it's environment helps to prevent the stress and depression. Moreover, animals also crucial part of atmosphere.
The provided table illustrate the information about the percentage of people expenditures on different item of five countries namely USA, Italy Spain, Sweden as well as Turkey in 2001.
After analyzing, it can be clearly seen that the expenses of people's on food, drink an tabacco was higher in all countries as compared to clothing and entertainment. In Turkey, people spent 32.4 14% on food, drink and tobacco rather than other countries. Apart from that, in USA it was 28.9 31% and 16. 36% in Italy. In Spain it 18.80%.
By contrast, in USA and Turkey the individuals spent high amont on fashion as well as entertainment respectively 26.43% and 14.35% whereasless amount spent by people on entertainment in USA, it was 2.21 %. On fashion, people's expenses was 6.51%, in Spain. On the contrary, in Sweden, meals and fashion individual spent amount which was identical.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is evident that the majority of people spent most on food, drink and tabacco followed by clothing footwear and finally least consumer spending was on leisure, education.
- the increase in people s life expectancy means that they have to work order to face for their retirement one alternative is that people start to work at a young Graves in this alternative a positive or negative development 61
- In many countries tradition food are being replaced by international fast food this is having a negative effect on both families and societies to what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The charts below show the percentage of five kind of books sold by a bookseller between 1972 and 2012 67
- in a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities other believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport 61
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals during festival periods peoplenowadays only want to enjoy themselves To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any re 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...ttention as well as resources have been spend for the protection of wild animals and ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...mals and birds are parts of eco system. Thats why the protection of wild animals is m...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extincts'?
Suggestion: extincts
...e, Lion always eat other animals, if it extinct then food chain can be ommited. In this...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'zoos'' or 'zoo's'?
Suggestion: zoos'; zoo's
... can be ommited. In this situation, the zoos protection necessary for animals. Apart...
^^^^
Line 8, column 85, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... the expenses of peoples on food, drink an tabacco was higher in all countries as ...
^^
Line 10, column 152, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'finally the least'.
Suggestion: finally the least
...bacco followed by clothing footwear and finally least consumer spending was on leisure, educa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, look, moreover, so, then, well, whereas, apart from, for instance, such as, as well as, in my opinion, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2181.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 429.0 315.596192385 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08391608392 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77388442976 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 4.76152304609 420% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.1628623247 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.875 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.38176352705 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 3.4128256513 381% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243209635606 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601145085341 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759138459653 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105358127829 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670722124093 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.