Some people feel that the government should regulate the level of violence in films on television and at the cinema. Others feel that violent films should not be regulated. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In recent years, people have differing views about there being so many violence sensations in film , while a school of thought holds that those may not be regulated. In my view, I believe that the government should control how much violence a film can feature.
On the one hand, proponents of the idea that the government should not limit the appearance of violence on film tend to point out a combination of reasons. Should violent acts in movie be censored, the film become less attractive. Therefore, no audience is interested in it. Consequently, it will cause a loss to the producer and seriously affect the movie industry in the world. On top of that, at the present time some violent films are recorded in tourist attractions. So if the government eliminates those actions, then the local area may not have a chance to advertise its tourist attractions. This may result in the fact that the country’s tourism will be adversely impacted.
On the other hand, I advocate those who believe that there should be governmental interference in violent movies. First and foremost, in today’s modern society the government does not limit the age of the audience so that children watch some unsuitable films for their age. It may lead to whey may imitate those actions which are inappropriate to their age. A telling example is that a 4-year-old child, after watching a movie with a sense of suicide, imitated it. As a result, the children were dead. Moreover, when people see too many of those actions it may be a motive for domestic violence in daily life which can lead to many people being dead. On top of that, in the worst scenario, violence in movies can breed extreme crimes, such as murder or mass shootings.
In conclusion, while a number of people thought that violent actions might not be regulated, the government may regulate the level of violence and they must give strict laws to limit the age of the audience and how often those appear.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-29 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | Hannahnguyen | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-12 | ngannguyen2408 | 84 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...eing so many violence sensations in film , while a school of thought holds that th...
^^
Line 2, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hould violent acts in movie be censored, the film become less attractive. Therefo...
^^
Line 2, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... interested in it. Consequently, it will cause a loss to the producer and serious...
^^
Line 2, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oss to the producer and seriously affect the movie industry in the world. On top ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81602373887 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66661287045 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519287833828 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1324424153 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4705882353 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8235294118 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.82352941176 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282992295497 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861329785069 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790130389423 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18854325509 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416815313471 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...eing so many violence sensations in film , while a school of thought holds that th...
^^
Line 2, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hould violent acts in movie be censored, the film become less attractive. Therefo...
^^
Line 2, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... interested in it. Consequently, it will cause a loss to the producer and serious...
^^
Line 2, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oss to the producer and seriously affect the movie industry in the world. On top ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81602373887 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66661287045 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519287833828 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1324424153 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4705882353 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8235294118 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.82352941176 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282992295497 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861329785069 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790130389423 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18854325509 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416815313471 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.