Some people feel that manufactures and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce to amount of packaging of goods While other argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packing Discuss both views and give your opinion

People hold conflicting views about whether the great variety of packages is the responsibility of shops or customers. While a number of people believe that production factories should decrease the use of packages, I would argue that awareness of customers is more improved when buying.

There are various compelling reasons why the amount of wrapping paper that is thrown out every day is partly due to the factories. Firstly, instead of using recycling and cloth materials to wrap the goods that they produce, they use plastic bags or nonrenewable resources to cover and deliver to the shops and markets. Secondly, the untreated bags dumped into the environment can cause a host of serious problems for our world such as global warming, ice melting and natural catastrophe. Therefore, wild animals may have lost their habitat and more and more of the quantity of rare animals are on the verge of extinction.

On the other hand, individuals also have a responsibility to protect the environment from pollution by curtailing their consumption of products that are packaged in non-recyclable substances. Besides, clients can make a suggestion with the managers of the shops if they are not being environmentally responsible. Therefore, consumers can change the company’s attitude towards the materials that they use to package their goods. As a result, we can build a more friendly society if we raise awareness of people and act together.

In conclusion, factories and people both take responsibility for the amount of packing of products. The government also needs to play a vital role in this issue by enacting stringent laws for all companies to obey.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ttitude towards the materials that they use to package their goods. As a result, we...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21641791045 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00006497294 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611940298507 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4240707456 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166000188197 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566107946358 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546731947157 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995395198531 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469474887353 0.056905535591 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.