Some people feel that public money should not be spent on cultural amenities such as museums, theatres and art festivals. how important do you think these things are to society as a whole? Are there any areas which are more important for the government to fund?
There is a widespread concern that authorities do not ought to subsidise cultural events and facilities as there are more significant things for the governmental funding. This essay will examine this disputable question and provide possible alternatives, which are needed to BE encourageD.
Admittedly, it Seems that music festivals and THE visual art in form of theatres and museums play A relaxing and recreational role for people, distracting them from work and allowing to SOME spend quality time with family and friends. Nevertheless, this sphere appears to be more entertaining rather than educational; and moreover, it demands production of different items that are not vital for living and contribute to consumerism.
Perhaps one of the major areaS of the state investments tends to be education. This measure might solve a number of social challenges such as illiteracy, brain drain and unemployment. If citizens had opportunities and availability of robust studying inside of the country, they would remain in homeland and motivate in its improvement. Foremost among these problems for public money investitions could be environmental sustainability. Without coordinate actions and funds from national organizations, the air, soil and water continue to deteriorate, leading to A decrease of biodiversity and malnutrition. This demonstrates the importance of this threat and people are obligated to address it.
It is logical to conclude that although subsidizing of the artistic facilities may be useful for people rehabilitation and life/work balance, however, the ecological issues and academic possibilities constitute essential ways OF financiaL support from the national leadership.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | angellica | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | ahmadrava88 | 78 | view |
- The best way to educate children is not using the Internet in every lesson. To what extent do you share this opinion? What other ways are there of making lessons effective for children? 61
- The internet will never replace traditional course books in schools. How far do you agree with this prediction? 84
- Some employers offer their employees subsidised membership of gyms and sports clubs, believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers see no benefit in doing so. Consider the arguments from both aspects 84
- The chart below shows participation in certain leisure activities by children in Australia 89
- In many countries, traditional dress and costumes are considered effective ways of maintaining links with the past. How effective can traditional costumes be, in this sense? What other ways exist to help citizens connect with a country’s past? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., which are needed to BE encourageD. Admittedly, it Seems that music festival...
^^^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re entertaining rather than educational; and moreover, it demands production of d...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...living and contribute to consumerism. Perhaps one of the major areaS of the st...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d people are obligated to address it. It is logical to conclude that although ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79761904762 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32863188854 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.678571428571 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0660122428 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.818181818 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9090909091 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193547345788 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625729682429 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447697738186 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0988816670409 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288301437054 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.