Some people get into debt by buying things they don t need and can t afford What are the reasons for this behaviour What action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem

The affairs read that a fair few people have a tendency to exceed their budget and pour their money down the toilet by purchasing items that they do not make most use out of. The phenonmenon bounds to crop up the consquence: dumping them in debt. From my perspectives, I will elaborate on the roots of the problem, as well as suggesting addresses to the predicament.

Speculating to the driving factors, it may boil down to crux of the issue: shopaholic impulse. It can be without saying that some people have a thirll to be addicted to shopping. In essence, it hinges on the satisfaction of spending money, owing to psychological explanation, that leaves windows for reckless purchases. The more you flaunt money, the more you hypothetically sense the empowerment of opulence. It is a dead-end circle that, labeld as an addiction, one may find it hard to escape; you will end up battery milking your budget by more extravagant products without considering its usability. Effectively, they will fall into debt traps.

Pivoting on the prevention, financial managment is the cornerstone for a sustainable lifestyle. It is of best importance that skills for monitoring your expenditure are must-need to avoid the worst scenarios. It is advisable that one should pay heed to their financial planning by categorizing and delineating different expense of money based on their purposes. Then, the adherence to plan is essential; one should try to limit misusage of specific category if not neccessary. Therefore, mentally speaking, shopaholics must endeavour to restrain themselves from spending appeal. Moreover, stricten managment allows one to impede risks and avail back-up resources under certain circumstances.

In conclusion, it is not in favor of anyone to arrive at debts. Actions regarding self-concerned financial mangement ought to be compelled to be taken serious consideration.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the best'.
Suggestion: of the best
...tone for a sustainable lifestyle. It is of best importance that skills for monitoring y...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16205980687 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636666666667 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2365486268 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7647058824 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6470588235 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82352941176 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153043722463 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436418832645 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06074040001 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0826693037269 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294484121856 0.056905535591 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.