Some people hold a belief that schools should be a place where students study academic subjects to pass examinations rather than learn skills such as dressing and cooking. In my opinion, despite the significance of academic study and exams, students should also be taught fundamental life skills.
Some people believe that students should learn academic subjects to pass tests at school instead of learning skills such as cooking and dressing. In my point of view, despite the importance of academic study and exams, youngsters should be taught basic life skills.
The initial reason is to help students with their future careers and also their life. For instance, when they have problems with their jobs or life, they can solve them immediately. By contrast, if children just learn theories and they do not have any practical lessons, they can not imagine the situations so they will be stuck in those problems. Therefore, it is important to provide practical lessons to students so they can be prepared for the real world. It will also help students develop problem-solving skills, which can be invaluable in their future careers.
On the other hand, students can get bored when they just look at books and write down several theories. This also causes dropouts in many counterparts. The government should offer some practical classes for the younger generation in schools so they will be interested in going to school. Additionally, when they are taught life skills, they have to do some outside activities in order to remember the skills, so they can try their efforts to complete them. This will give them a more hands-on approach to learning and allow them to apply their knowledge to real-world situations. This will also help to motivate them to stay in school and develop the necessary skills to succeed in their future.
In conclusion, although studying hypotheses is essential, students should be taught the necessary life skills to help them when they graduate. They need to know these skills to have a better and easier life.
- The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 73
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 67
- Write a letter to an English teacher whom you know and ask to borrow some English books to help a child of your friend to study you write Due details of the child Do you plan to teach him or her Which books do you want to borrow 78
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the government rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03448275862 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57573973767 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531034482759 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8143600002 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214017121499 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089495694408 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111380948242 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198402661733 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170448475839 0.056905535591 300% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.