Some people prefer famous brand of clothing, car and other items. What are the reasons? Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages?
The trend of purchasing items with a well-known label is a major topic of concern in today's society. It is widely understood that people often associate a famous brand with quality. In this essay, I will outline several benefits as well as drawbacks of buying renowned brand items after point out the causes for this trend.
The reasons that contribute to this trend are innumerable. Firstly, the public believes that, popular items are more reliable and are of premium quality. For example, watches designed by Rolex are definitely unique and authentic. Secondly, these items are often considered as a tool for the rich to show off their social status or their wealth. Some types of goods like cars from luxurious brands are usually sold at exorbitant prices because of their expensive materials or unique features.
On the one hand, more people purchasing goods from famous brands can bring drawbacks to their finances. Many youngsters do not take it into careful consideration and often make impulsive purchases, which may sink them into financial problems. For instance, it is not uncommon to see a woman buying a luxury brand dress that she never wears or a man buying a car that he uses only once in blue moon.
On the other hand, I believe that the benefits of buying famous brand items, far outweigh the aforementioned drawbacks. It is undeniable that reputable brands offer products of high quality and reliability, providing buyers with a great sense of satisfaction. Therefore these expensive products would motivate people to make money to buy them and at the same time help develop the economy. For instance, Apple’s smart phones are sold out immediately, which are famous for their durability and world-class security.
In conclusion, the tendency of consuming goods from famous brands largely comes from people’s perception of personal belongings showing their wealth, social status and appearance. While there are indeed several limitations with regard to buying well-known brand commodities, I believe its positivesare far more significant.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 260, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ers with a great sense of satisfaction. Therefore these expensive products would motivate...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'belongings'.
Suggestion: belongings
...rgely comes from people’s perception of personal belongings showing their wealth, social status and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25075528701 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76080700039 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580060422961 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9209282886 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.235294118 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4705882353 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.94117647059 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189721514538 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060176004408 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428970837045 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104225441625 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0120064944709 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.