Some people prefer to live in small family units, while others think it is better to live in large family groups. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People have different opinions about the ideal size of a family. While some people claim that living in an extended family can bring about several advantages, I believe a smaller one would be a better option.
On the one hand, people can gain some benefits from living in a big family. Firstly, due to daily activities such as cooking or having meals, people can pass on their traditional values from generation to generation. For example, grandmothers often heirloom recipes with their daughters and nieces. As a result, this will help strengthen connections among members. Secondly, household chores can be done in a much faster and easier way. For example, a person is sweeping the floor while others are hanging clothes or watering plants. Consequently, they might have more time for relaxation.
On the other hand, there are several reasons why people prefer a small family. The first one is that it allows these people to freely make their own decisions about their life. For instance, some men often stay up late to watch football matches and make noise without the older’s judgment or complaints. Therefore, it might allow people to experience less chances of conflicts. Furthermore, children who live in this family type might receive more attention from their parents. For example, mothers can help their children with school materials. Consequently, their offspring are likely to be given proper education. If people choose to live in an extended family, the parents will not have enough time and money to invest in each of their children.
In conclusion, a big family can allow people to do housework more easily and share their family values. However, I think it is better to live in a nuclear family due to the fact that they can have more freedom and take care of others.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-09-18 | Nguyễn Thị Thanh Thảo | 61 | view |
- Countries should try to produce all the food for the population and import as little food as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Today parents spend little free time with their children Why is it the case Who are more affected parents or children 67
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing for example through cell phone tracking and security cameras In many cases the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening Do you think the advantages 61
- Some people prefer to live in small family units while others think it is better to live in large family groups Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The pie charts illustrate the proportion of sodium saturated fats and added sugars in four types of meals in the USA
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...re, it might allow people to experience less chances of conflicts. Furthermore, chil...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56212585344 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9435521232 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.6315789474 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7894736842 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1052631579 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226432132231 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690792604519 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703484425693 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165179652074 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599580024292 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...re, it might allow people to experience less chances of conflicts. Furthermore, chil...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56212585344 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9435521232 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.6315789474 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7894736842 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1052631579 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226432132231 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690792604519 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703484425693 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165179652074 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599580024292 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.