some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Life always changes for time-to-time. However, some people argue that evolution creates unnecessary effects, while others believe that as an advanced lifestyle. In spite of that, I supportively convince that progressive action stays importantly as well as preserving old tradition.
Modern lifestyle, thinking ahead, supports people to innovate something new. Something that could embrace the essential human needs. At the prehistoric era, our predecessors might prolong their life through hunting. However, after a hundred years left, they began to manage new method that was cultivating a land. Farming is the ancient technology which was born due to progressive idea.
In another view, people may confront that idea. They may say that innovation leads to a disaster. The technology that modern scientists invent does not cooperate with nature. Fossil fuel technology occupies the limited resources that are held by the earth. Furthermore, that industry emits gas emission that can pollute the land-living habitats and terrestrial ecosystem. This is, however, the result of innovation that denies the cause of it.
Whether fundamental action or modern thought, people should adapt to a new situation. However, that aim cannot be reached if we stay still. Progressive action must be created. Scientists have to evaluate the previous mistake. Fortunately, today, thanks to advanced technology, people should not worry about unfriendly technology. Scientists invent the energy that does not harm the environment, such as solar energy.
Above all, changing is necessary to human behavior in order to avoid unnecessary fault action. Furthermore, the most important aspect that we should consider is that the innovative idea that could embrace the old and the new tradition in providing a better life for humankind.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-12 | quynhan1995 | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-08 | Gurpreet singh00p0 | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-13 | tuantai21194 | 61 | view |
| 2018-05-25 | Gokhan_Kurt | 89 | view |
| 2018-05-25 | Gokhan_Kurt | 89 | view |
- With and increasing population communicating via the Internet and text messaging, face-to-face communication will become a thing of the past.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not real needs of the society in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 78
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the cours 78
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... providing a better life for humankind.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, well, while, such as, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61818181818 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86370504968 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647272727273 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1465566066 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.2272727273 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.5 20.7667163134 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95454545455 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10316037221 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0267688038621 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0296511785014 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0547939130864 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189543830942 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.43 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.