Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
A healthy body enables students to concentrate on subjects they are learning, helps staff to work efficiently and adds to pleasure in daily life. Thus, it is important to improve public health. Some contend that building sports facilities is the best way, while other maintain that those facilities exert few impacts and enhancing health levels entail other measures. In my opinion, sports centers are not necessary and people cannot benefit a lot from those facilities.
Some people believe that the best way to improve local people's health is to increase the number of sports facilities. They argue that those facilities such as gyms can provide opportunities for residents to exercise. Jogging in the street can be dangerous and going climbing usually takes people a great deal of time. Therefore, people can play sports in the gyms, which saves plenty of time and protect people from vehicles in the street. In addition, people will enjoy doing sports in those stadiums because they can exercise regardless of weather. When it is raining or snowing, outdoor activities like playing badminton could be stopped.
However, others including me consider that those sports facilities would not effectively change people's mind to exercise more. Firstly, although gyms facilitate people to do exercise, ordinary people cannot afford the admission of those centres. In China, people have to pay one thousand or even more to buy the one-year ticket to the gym. Moreover, building sports centres can cost the local government lots of money. In the countryside, the government is not able to spend so much money on the construction of new buildings. Accordingly, government should take other measurements. Organizing badminton competitions in the local area can be a good choice which can encourage citizens to practice playing badminton a lot. Another measurement is that overweight people can be rewarded trainers when they make progress in losing weight.
In conclusion, while sports facilities may offer benefits, public health will not be significantly improved by building more sports center. Other measures like competitions and rewards can inspire people to do more exercise.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | Amila Priynatha | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | Leeinho | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | MHT | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | Gholamirayaneh | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | junjunh | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan 73
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The plans below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- "Over 80 percent of the respondents to a recent survey indicated a desire to reduce their intake of foods containing fats and cholesterol, and today low-fat products abound in many food stores. Since many of the food products currently marketed by Ol 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37609329446 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75132787908 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574344023324 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0710766914 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.2 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.15 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231734187085 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787174420906 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930708781957 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159767861732 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362647186137 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.