Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sport facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give you

It is commonly thought, With improving sports equipment in quantity, we achieve to the acceptable level of health. But also there is another view which has emphasized on the other effective factors even more important than exercising.

Nowadays, There are enormous advertisements in the field of sports and exercising that definitely have supported by different producers and companies which their specific goal has been their high sales. Therefore, in this area if we do not be aware of using nonstandard tools and their side effects, not only it cost a lot of money for consumer but also it would be caused of suffering more pain. Although, If the people choose a good equipment and use it in accurate way it would release their pain step by step and help them to be in the good physical state and in this case the individual's demand would be rise to provide such a useful sport facility.

In contrary, Some people suggest other factors such as having a low fat diet, clean environment, consumption of organic product more than chemical may convince the society for having more health instead of sports facilities that they believe have a small role in our life.

In conclusion, If the persons learn how they should deal with their physical problems alternatively they would distinguish that all tasks that considered in above is significant aspects which will support our health in good condition in parallel way to reach more healthiness and prosperous in future.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s even more important than exercising. Nowadays, There are enormous advertiseme...
^^^^
Line 3, column 656, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o provide such a useful sport facility. In contrary, Some people suggest other f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 292, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...o reach more healthiness and prosperous in future.
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1260.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01992031873 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75458178855 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609561752988 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 20.2975951904 172% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.4244849921 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 180.0 106.682146367 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.8571428571 20.7667163134 173% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162825457926 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736583354281 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322866900479 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993154451934 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307196044001 0.056905535591 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 13.0946893788 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.1190380762 158% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.