Some people say that Ebooks and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspapers and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree.
From the early 20th century till to the present in every sector in our daily life we are seeing the flourishing of technology and hopefully, it continues in the future. In contemporary times people use different handheld devices to read books or newspapers, while it is not comfortable for many. Perhaps in the coming times, human beings will be more used to reading electronic books. From my perspective, I can say shortly online books and news feeds will replace the hard copy.
On the one hand, now we are living in the era of information technology and the internet is available for everyone, therefore they can read the book online in their home without going to the library. For example, in the UK most of the universities have their online library, as a consequence, virtual attendance is increasing day by day rather than physical. In addition, apps, different software, and online portals give 24 hours live news updates and notifications to the people, as a result, more men and women use it to get more information rapidly.
On the other hand, in recent times people are more concerned about ecological changes, while people have had to face difficulties due to climate changes. For printed newspapers and magazines we daily need millions of green trees, whereas many people are against such kinds of activities. So it influences to increase the number of networked readers. For instance, the number of subscribers of different online news feeds is increasing day by day as in 2014 the New York Times had 7. 9 million subscribers and in 2020 the amount went to 52. 2 million.
In conclusion, to sum up, all the points above, it is clear that, in the future, all hard copies will be replaced by online copies.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-08-01 | Sanaullah97 | 78 | view |
- The bar charts below show the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001 78
- The maps below show a science park in 2008 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that young people should choose their profession themselves Others believe that their parents should choose for them Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84121621622 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75658907479 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587837837838 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3472023306 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.230769231 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0955598232404 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0308106338675 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344822914104 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0581169820552 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292976544405 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.