Some people say economic development is necessary to reduce the poverty in the world Others say that economic growth should be stop immediately to stop damaging the environment Discuss both sides and give your opinion

The benefits and drawbacks of economic development have been being one of the most controversial issues in recent decades. To some people, it seems impossible to eliminate famine and destitution without economic growth. However, the negative effects on the environment are enormous that other people think it must be stopped. I do not completely agree with the second idea that we have to forsake the economy to protect the environment. Instead, we should develop Eco-friendly technologies and energy.

On the one hand, the benefits of economic growth are noticeable. The industrialization brings tremendous amount of job opportunities for people all over the world. Through economic activities, governments will have more money from taxes which can be used to enhance living conditions of poor people such as complimentary food and shelters. Farmers also benefit from the global trading when their agricultural products are able to be consumed in large supermarkets or exported.

On the flip side, the destructive impacts of economic growth on the environmental ecosystem and biodiversity are obviously immense. To make way for factories and commercial centers, rain forests and wildlife habitat such as swamps have to be flattened, hence, bring many species to the edge of extinction. Moreover, chemical toxic emitted from industrial zones can cause air pollution and seriously damage to water resources.

However, we should not sacrifice the tremendous advantages brought by economic development to conserve the environment. Instead, we can apply advanced sciences and technologies to minimize bad effects of economic growth. For instance, manufacturers are able to use electricity generated by clean energy sources such as solar or wind power. Industrial wastewater can be treated by modern technologies to eliminate contaminants before discharging back the environment.

In conclusion, the ideas that we must stop economic growth to protect the environment or we should keep it as the top priority to put an end to famine and poverty still remain a source of controversy. We must consider both negative and positive ramifications in order to have appropriate economic development strategies.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1876.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19001840439 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591044776119 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9136976587 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.222222222 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6111111111 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267340099231 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811817488856 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490586526003 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143200465035 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314791969507 0.056905535591 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.