Many people use written language in a less formal way and in a relaxed way than in the past Why is that so Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages

In their written language, an increasing number of people tend to use less serious or formal tone. I think this phenomenon results from three main reasons, and its advantages outweigh the drawbacks.

The first reason for the shift in the style of linguistic expression is the influence of technology, namely computers and smartphones. Because these devices have become the principal means of communication, some people tend to type faster and shorter so that they can transfer more information. Inevitably, formal linguistic structures, which are usually long and complicated, might be considered time-consuming and distracting. Therefore, less formal language, with the tacit agreement between both sides, is preferred. Secondly, many writers avoid using serious styles because they want to maintain a more friendly atmosphere and a closer interaction with their readers. We should make it clear that being less formal does not equivalent to being informal or somewhat impolite. Finally, unnecessarily sophisticated language might cloud the attempt of readers to grasp writers’ intention. For example, in a factory, a new regulation written in an easy tone might help workers understand better.
Although some are convinced that this development is degrading the integrity of language, I think it is a positive evolution of our society. In academic arena, using less formal linguistic structures reduces the pressure writing and reading of both writers and readers. Without paying attention to strict grammar rules or tones, writers are able to express their ideas more naturally. Secondly, this tendency might encourage young writers to write. Informal or inappropriate language, of course, should not be employed or misused any situation.
In conclusion, there are some reasons why people have become more relaxed in their written language, and I believe the benefits of this change are greater than its drawbacks.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... using less formal linguistic structures reduces the pressure writing and reading...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion, of course

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59246575342 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94455830736 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606164383562 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8407861778 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.0625 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255416277049 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701278365169 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591120830266 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163941617795 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048018847087 0.056905535591 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.